Key Takeaways
- Docker relies on a root-privileged daemon (
dockerd
), while Podman operates daemonless. - Podman supports full Rootless container management out of the box.
- Docker requires additional setup to integrate with Kubernetes, while Podman is natively CRI-O compatible.
- With Podman, containers are managed as independent Linux processes β no always-on background service needed.
- Rootless Podman significantly reduces the security risks associated with traditional Docker setups.
- If
dockerd
crashes, Docker containers may be impacted; Podman containers remain unaffected. - Modern container orchestration trends (like Kubernetes) increasingly favor daemonless runtimes like Podman.
π Read the full article on Medium
Stay tuned for more deep dives into the evolving world of container technology! π
Top comments (0)