Asynchronous JavaScript has come a long wayβfrom callback hell to Promises and now the elegant async/await
syntax. But even in modern code, developers often ask:
βShould I use
async/await
orPromise.all()
?β
Letβs settle the debate with clear examples, performance comparisons, and best practices in 2025.
π§ The Core Difference
-
async/await
: Executes asynchronous operations sequentially, unless used withPromise.all
. -
Promise.all()
: Executes multiple promises in parallel and waits for all of them to resolve (or reject).
β‘ Sequential vs Parallel
Letβs say you need to make 3 API calls.
β Sequential Execution (async/await
)
const getData = async () => {
const a = await fetchDataA(); // wait
const b = await fetchDataB(); // wait
const c = await fetchDataC(); // wait
return [a, b, c];
};
Time taken β
fetchDataA
+fetchDataB
+fetchDataC
β
Parallel Execution (Promise.all
)
const getData = async () => {
const [a, b, c] = await Promise.all([
fetchDataA(),
fetchDataB(),
fetchDataC(),
]);
return [a, b, c];
};
Time taken β max(
fetchDataA
,fetchDataB
,fetchDataC
)
π§ Use Promise.all()
when tasks are independent and can run in parallel.
π₯ What About Errors?
Promise.all()
Fails Fast:
try {
const [a, b] = await Promise.all([failingFunc(), successFunc()]);
} catch (err) {
console.error('At least one failed:', err);
}
If any promise rejects, the entire Promise.all()
rejects.
Want All Results No Matter What? Use Promise.allSettled()
:
const results = await Promise.allSettled([
mightFail1(),
mightFail2(),
]);
results.forEach((result) => {
if (result.status === 'fulfilled') console.log(result.value);
else console.error(result.reason);
});
π Looping with Async Ops
Hereβs where async/await
shines: inside loops.
β Not Ideal
for (const user of users) {
await sendEmail(user); // sequential, slow
}
β
Better: Use Promise.all
with .map()
await Promise.all(users.map(user => sendEmail(user)));
π This sends emails in parallel. Much faster.
π§ TL;DR β When to Use What?
Use Case | Use async/await
|
Use Promise.all()
|
---|---|---|
Tasks must run sequentially | β | β |
Tasks are independent | β | β |
You need all results, even fails | β | β
Promise.allSettled()
|
Error handling per task | β | β |
Inside a loop | β (small data) | β
.map() + Promise.all for large data |
π§ͺ Bonus: Performance Benchmark
For I/O-bound operations like API calls or DB queries, parallel execution with Promise.all()
significantly improves response time. For CPU-bound tasks, consider using Web Workers or moving to a language like Go or Rust.
β¨ Final Thoughts
In 2025, writing performant async code is less about picking one method and more about understanding concurrency.
- β
Use
async/await
for readability. - β
Use
Promise.all()
for speed. - β Combine both when necessary!
Top comments (0)