<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Forem: Vani Agarwal</title>
    <description>The latest articles on Forem by Vani Agarwal (@vaniagrwall).</description>
    <link>https://forem.com/vaniagrwall</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forem.com/feed/vaniagrwall"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>i spent 2 weeks comparing deep research APIs so you don’t have to</title>
      <dc:creator>Vani Agarwal</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/vaniagrwall/i-spent-2-weeks-comparing-deep-research-apis-so-you-dont-have-to-4kcf</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/vaniagrwall/i-spent-2-weeks-comparing-deep-research-apis-so-you-dont-have-to-4kcf</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;deep research APIs are a new category. OpenAI, Perplexity, Google, and startups like Parallel are all shipping systems that can browse the web, synthesize sources, and return cited answers in a single API call. these tools are powerful, BUT choosing between them currently is not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;over the last couple weeks, i kept running into the same problem:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;pricing scattered across docs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;capabilities buried in changelogs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;benchmarks inconsistent, missing, or not public&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“it returns citations” used as a proxy for quality&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so instead of guessing, i decided to actually compare them. this post is about what i learned, how i think about evaluation now, and why i built a public index to track this space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  how i approached evaluation
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;instead of reading docs in isolation, i did three things in parallel:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;ran real queries&lt;/strong&gt;: i tested market analysis, technical research, competitive intel, and product strategy prompts across providers — not just trivia or synthetic benchmarks.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;read provider docs + benchmarks side-by-side&lt;/strong&gt;: this made inconsistencies obvious very quickly, such as different definitions of “grounding”, benchmarks that aren’t comparable and pricing models that hide real cost drivers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;tracked tradeoffs&lt;/strong&gt;: there isn’t a single “best” deep research api. there are tradeoffs, specifically, depth vs latency, or cost vs accuracy or batch workflows vs interactive use. once i framed it that way, the space became much clearer.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  why i built the deep research api index
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;after doing this manually, i realized there was no neutral, centralized place to:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;compare providers side-by-side&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;run the same prompt across them&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;track how things change over time&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so i built one at &lt;a href="https://dev.tourl"&gt;deep-research-index.vercel.app&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fjvxfgexyryrdhwauemwg.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fjvxfgexyryrdhwauemwg.png" alt=" " width="800" height="429"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it’s an independent index that:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;compares providers across concrete metrics&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;lets you run identical prompts across multiple apis&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;makes tradeoffs explicit instead of hiding them&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this isn’t a startup pitch, it's more it’s a reference i wanted to exist.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
      <category>api</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
