<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Forem: Richard Angapin</title>
    <description>The latest articles on Forem by Richard Angapin (@richard_angapin).</description>
    <link>https://forem.com/richard_angapin</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forem.com/feed/richard_angapin"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Scanned 50 Web Agency Websites &amp; Most Failed Basic Security</title>
      <dc:creator>Richard Angapin</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 01:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/richard_angapin/i-scanned-50-web-agency-websites-most-failed-basic-security-pjb</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/richard_angapin/i-scanned-50-web-agency-websites-most-failed-basic-security-pjb</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Web agencies sell expertise in &lt;strong&gt;performance&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;UX&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;SEO&lt;/strong&gt;, but how many actually implement basic &lt;strong&gt;security headers&lt;/strong&gt;? I decided to find out. I randomly picked 50 agency websites from LinkedIn and audited each one using &lt;a href="https://securityheaders.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;SecurityHeaders.com&lt;/a&gt;. The results?&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Security Report Card
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's how the grades broke down:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Grade&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;% of Agencies&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;A&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;8%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;B&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;C&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;D&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;30%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;52%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over half scored an &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;nearly 80%&lt;/strong&gt; earned a &lt;strong&gt;D or worse&lt;/strong&gt;. These grades reflect missing security headers that have been best practices for years. The pattern is interesting: agencies excel at optimizing &lt;em&gt;what users can see&lt;/em&gt; but often overlook &lt;em&gt;security headers that browsers check&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What's Actually Missing
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These aren't experimental features. They're established security headers that have been recommended for years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Header&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Agencies Missing&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;X-Frame-Options&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;86%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Strict-Transport-Security&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;82%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;X-Content-Type-Options&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;80%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Referrer-Policy&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;74%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Content-Security-Policy&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;70%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  What these headers do:
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;X-Frame-Options prevents your site from being embedded in iframes on other domains&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Strict-Transport-Security forces browsers to use HTTPS connections&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;X-Content-Type-Options stops browsers from incorrectly interpreting file types&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Referrer-Policy controls what information is shared when users click links&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Content-Security-Policy helps prevent cross-site scripting and other code injection attacks&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While missing these headers doesn't guarantee a security breach, implementing them significantly improves your security posture.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why These Get Missed
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's rarely deliberate. In most teams, it's simply a &lt;strong&gt;process blind spot&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Headers are invisible to clients&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;They don't affect visuals or performance metrics&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Teams move fast and reuse old deployment templates&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Manual checks are tedious and easy to skip&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Once configured, they're rarely revisited&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Security headers often get documented but not continuously monitored.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Quick Win
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Want to improve your security grade significantly? Add these to your Nginx config:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight nginx"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="k"&gt;add_header&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;X-Frame-Options&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;"SAMEORIGIN"&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;always&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="k"&gt;add_header&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;Strict-Transport-Security&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;"max-age=31536000"&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;always&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="k"&gt;add_header&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;X-Content-Type-Options&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;"nosniff"&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;always&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="k"&gt;add_header&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;Referrer-Policy&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;"strict-origin-when-cross-origin"&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="s"&gt;always&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;That's it. Four lines that add meaningful security layers. For additional protection, consider implementing a &lt;strong&gt;Content-Security-Policy&lt;/strong&gt; using nonces or hashes (see &lt;a href="https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Content_Security_Policy_Cheat_Sheet.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;OWASP's CSP Cheat Sheet&lt;/a&gt;). Using Apache or .htaccess? Check &lt;a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;MDN's HTTP Headers reference&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Wake-Up Call
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you build or maintain sites, check your own domain first, then your clients'. &lt;a href="https://securityheaders.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;SecurityHeaders.com&lt;/a&gt; gives you instant results. Big thanks to Scott Helme and team for this excellent free tool!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Manually checking 50 sites took me hours, which is exactly why I built &lt;a href="https://achilleus.so" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Achilleus&lt;/a&gt; to facilitate security header monitoring across multiple sites.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  And you, what's Your Security Grade?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check your site and share your grade in the comments below 👇&lt;/p&gt;




</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>development</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
