<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Forem: Mithun GS</title>
    <description>The latest articles on Forem by Mithun GS (@mithun_gs).</description>
    <link>https://forem.com/mithun_gs</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forem.com/feed/mithun_gs"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why Isn’t True Zero-Trust Encryption Used in Email Systems?</title>
      <dc:creator>Mithun GS</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 08:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/mithun_gs/why-isnt-true-zero-trust-encryption-used-in-email-systems-3mae</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/mithun_gs/why-isnt-true-zero-trust-encryption-used-in-email-systems-3mae</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most “secure email” platforms still rely on provider-managed keys:&lt;br&gt;
either the provider generates the user’s key pair, or stores an encrypted copy for sync, or encrypts stored mail with server-side keys. In all cases, the provider retains theoretical decrypting capability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A strict zero-trust model would require:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;user-generated private keys&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;provider never storing or handling private keys&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;stored mail encrypted only with the user’s public key&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;no server-side key material that could decrypt data&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;provider cryptographically incapable of accessing message content&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This model is common in password managers and zero-knowledge file storage, but rarely seen in email.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the question is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What stops email providers from adopting true zero-trust storage?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is it:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;key-management friction for users?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;multi-device sync challenges?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;server-side search/indexing requirements?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;business reasons?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;or just legacy expectations around email UX?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious how others in the dev/crypto community see this.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>cybersecurity</category>
      <category>startup</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Checked Proton Mail’s Security… and I Was Not Ready for What I Saw 😳</title>
      <dc:creator>Mithun GS</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 07:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/mithun_gs/i-checked-proton-mails-security-and-i-was-not-ready-for-what-i-saw-2bal</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/mithun_gs/i-checked-proton-mails-security-and-i-was-not-ready-for-what-i-saw-2bal</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’m building Millionaire.email, a security-first email service.&lt;br&gt;
And like everyone else, I’ve always heard:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“Proton Mail is the most secure email on the planet.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I got curious.&lt;br&gt;
How did Proton get so much hype?&lt;br&gt;
Let me check their security… should take 5 minutes, right?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah. NO.&lt;br&gt;
That was the last peaceful thought I had. 😂&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I started checking DNSSEC… DANE… MTA-STS… TLS-RPT… DKIM…&lt;br&gt;
One by one…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And instead of finishing in minutes, I ended up sitting there like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“Wait… this can’t be right… WHAT?!” 😳&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DNSSEC not fully enforced&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No ED25519 DKIM&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No DANE/TLSA&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MTA-STS gaps&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TLS-RPT missing in places&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I genuinely thought Proton would be flawless.&lt;br&gt;
But I got plot-twisted by reality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want the full technical breakdown (with proof):&lt;br&gt;
👉 &lt;a href="https://www.millionaire.email/post/millionaire-email-vs-proton-me-complete-security-architecture-comparison-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.millionaire.email/post/millionaire-email-vs-proton-me-complete-security-architecture-comparison-2025&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not throwing hate — Proton is good.&lt;br&gt;
But as someone building a secure email from scratch, this was a shock + comedy + motivation moment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it made my philosophy even stronger:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don’t trust us. Verify us. 🔐&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>startup</category>
      <category>cybersecurity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
