<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Forem: kawaljeet singh</title>
    <description>The latest articles on Forem by kawaljeet singh (@jskdjdjndjd).</description>
    <link>https://forem.com/jskdjdjndjd</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forem.com/feed/jskdjdjndjd"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>PSI Protocol – Cryptographic EU AI Act Compliance at $0.01 per Proof (IETF Draft Filed)</title>
      <dc:creator>kawaljeet singh</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/jskdjdjndjd/psi-protocol-cryptographic-eu-ai-act-compliance-at-001-per-proof-ietf-draft-filed-1nag</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/jskdjdjndjd/psi-protocol-cryptographic-eu-ai-act-compliance-at-001-per-proof-ietf-draft-filed-1nag</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a solo founder from Melbourne, Australia. I built this between jobs!No VC. No team. Just code and a deadline.&lt;br&gt;
The Problem:&lt;br&gt;
EU AI Act Article 50 goes live August 2, 2026. NDIS compliance deadline July 1, 2026. Every AI system needs tamper-evident, independently verifiable proof of compliance. Current solutions fail:&lt;br&gt;
Full ZK-ML: $1,000+ per proof&lt;br&gt;
Manual audits: $50K-$500K, periodic&lt;br&gt;
Logging tools: self-reported, not independently verifiable&lt;br&gt;
What I Built:&lt;br&gt;
PSI Protocol — a cryptographic compliance infrastructure with:&lt;br&gt;
SHA-256 + Ed25519 signatures + Binary Merkle trees&lt;br&gt;
3-node MPC consensus&lt;br&gt;
Article-mapped predicates (EU AI Act Articles 12, 13, 14, 15)&lt;br&gt;
$0.01 per cryptographically signed compliance receipt&lt;br&gt;
40 edge functions, 28 database tables, full enterprise platform&lt;br&gt;
What makes this different:&lt;br&gt;
Independent verifiability — regulators verify WITHOUT trusting us or you&lt;br&gt;
IETF standardized — draft-singh-psi-01 filed March 21, 2026&lt;br&gt;
Patent protected — AU2026902352&lt;br&gt;
Article-mapped — every receipt maps to specific regulatory articles&lt;br&gt;
Free forever — open source, $0.01 per proof&lt;br&gt;
Try it right now:&lt;br&gt;
curl -X POST &lt;a href="https://digital-gallows.apex-infrastructure.com/notarize" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://digital-gallows.apex-infrastructure.com/notarize&lt;/a&gt; -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"payload": "test compliance event"}'&lt;br&gt;
Links:&lt;br&gt;
Live: &lt;a href="https://digital-gallows.apex-infrastructure.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://digital-gallows.apex-infrastructure.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
IETF Draft: &lt;a href="https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-singh-psi-01.txt" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-singh-psi-01.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Patent: AU2026902352&lt;br&gt;
Open source. Free forever. Built for the world by one man with nothing to lose.&lt;br&gt;
I'll answer every question about the ZK logic, EU AI Act technical requirements, or IETF standardization process.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
