<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Forem: BTernaryTau</title>
    <description>The latest articles on Forem by BTernaryTau (@bternarytau).</description>
    <link>https://forem.com/bternarytau</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forem.com/feed/bternarytau"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>My thoughts on Microsoft acquiring GitHub</title>
      <dc:creator>BTernaryTau</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forem.com/bternarytau/my-thoughts-on-microsoft-acquiring-github-2h0p</link>
      <guid>https://forem.com/bternarytau/my-thoughts-on-microsoft-acquiring-github-2h0p</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;(Cross-posted from &lt;a href="https://bternarytau.github.io/2018/06/04/my-thoughts-on-microsoft-acquiring-github"&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;; last paragraph contains content that is somewhat political, particularly if you follow some of the links)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today it was announced that &lt;a href="https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/4/17422788/microsoft-github-acquisition-official-deal"&gt;Microsoft is acquiring GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. The responses to this event have been mixed, with some people expressing optimism and others fear. I have two lines of thought regarding this subject.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First of all, I don't expect Microsoft to ruin GitHub. I agree with those who believe that &lt;a href="https://dev.to/resir014/the-microsoft-thing-cb"&gt;Microsoft genuinely cares&lt;/a&gt; about open source. So long as software is a complement to Microsoft's products, Microsoft is &lt;a href="https://www.gwern.net/Complement"&gt;incentivized to support open source software&lt;/a&gt;. I was worried when I discovered that &lt;a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2016/this-is-the-new-microsoft-windows-slips-to-no-3-as-company-shifts-to-the-cloud/"&gt;Microsoft's revenue from Windows is dropping&lt;/a&gt; since operating systems are an obvious complement of software, but luckily Microsoft seems to be pivoting to cloud services, another complement of software. Therefore, I expect that Microsoft will at least avoid damaging GitHub in any way since it stands to gain from open source.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What does worry me is the larger pattern that this acquisition is a part of. Microsoft has made &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Microsoft#Key_acquisitions"&gt;a lot of acquisitions&lt;/a&gt; in the past, and it's far from the only company to do so. This pattern, along with some other factors, has resulted in a &lt;a href="https://srconstantin.wordpress.com/2018/05/31/monopoly-a-manifesto-and-fact-post/"&gt;major increase in market power&lt;/a&gt;, which means there's a lot less competition among companies. This leads to a variety of problems, including &lt;a href="http://rooseveltinstitute.org/how-widespread-labor-monopsony-some-new-results-suggest-its-pervasive/"&gt;lower wages&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-09-01/america-s-superstar-companies-are-a-drag-on-growth"&gt;less economic growth&lt;/a&gt;, and the phenomenon known as &lt;a href="https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/09/considerations-on-cost-disease/"&gt;cost disease&lt;/a&gt;, among many others. So while I don't think there's anything wrong with this acquisition specifically, in context it is part of an extremely harmful pattern that needs to be ended.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>github</category>
      <category>microsoft</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
