DEV Community

Alex Aslam
Alex Aslam

Posted on

GitLab CI Runners: Self-Hosted vs. Shared Runners (Pros and Cons

#webdev #programming #javascript #automation

Hey there, fellow coder! 👋 Let’s talk about something we’ve all grumbled about: waiting forever for your CI pipeline to finish. Maybe your tests are crawling, or that deployment job is stuck in a queue longer than a Starbucks line on Monday morning.

The culprit? Your GitLab CI Runner—the workhorse that executes your jobs. But here’s the kicker: not all runners are created equal. Choose the wrong type, and you’ll waste time, money, or worse… your will to live.

Let’s break down shared runners (GitLab’s freebies) vs. self-hosted runners (your custom muscle cars) so you can pick the right tool for the job.

What Even Are GitLab CI Runners?

Think of runners as your CI/CD “employees.” They:

  1. Pick up jobs from your pipeline (like “run tests” or “deploy to AWS”).
  2. Execute them in isolated environments (Docker containers, VMs).
  3. Report back to GitLab.

But who these employees are matters. Let’s meet the candidates.

Option 1: Shared Runners (GitLab’s Free Fleet)

What you get: Free, pre-configured runners managed by GitLab. Perfect for dipping your toes into CI/CD.

Pros ✅

  • Zero Setup: Just enable them in your project’s CI settings. Done.
  • Free Tier: Great for small projects or open-source repos (400 minutes/month on GitLab SaaS).
  • Maintenance-Free: GitLab handles updates, security patches, and scaling.
  • Multi-OS Support: Need Windows, Linux, or macOS? Shared runners have you covered.

Cons ❌

  • Slower Queues: Free = popular. Your job might wait behind 100 others.
  • Limited Control: Stuck with GitLab’s hardware and configurations.
  • Security Risks: Sensitive jobs run on GitLab’s infrastructure (not ideal for HIPAA/GDPR).
  • Cost Overages: Exceed free minutes? You’ll pay $10 per 1,000 minutes.

Best for:

  • Personal projects.
  • Open-source communities.
  • Teams testing the CI/CD waters.

Option 2: Self-Hosted Runners (Your Custom Workhorses)

What you get: Runners you install on your own servers, cloud VMs, or even a Raspberry Pi in your closet.

Pros ✅

  • Blazing Speed: No queueing. Your jobs run immediately.
  • Full Control: Choose hardware, OS, and software (e.g., GPU runners for ML).
  • Security: Sensitive data stays in-house (critical for healthcare, finance, etc.).
  • Cost-Effective: Cheaper long-term for high usage (no per-minute fees).

Cons ❌

  • Setup Hassle: Installing, updating, and troubleshooting is your job.
  • Scaling Headaches: Handle traffic spikes yourself (hello, Kubernetes clusters).
  • Upfront Costs: Pay for servers, storage, and DevOps time.

Best for:

  • Enterprise teams with strict compliance needs.
  • High-traffic projects (e.g., 1000+ pipeline jobs/day).
  • Custom environments (legacy apps, niche hardware).

The Showdown: Shared vs. Self-Hosted

Factor Shared Runners Self-Hosted Runners
Cost Free (with limits) $$$ upfront, cheaper long-term
Speed 🐢 Depends on queue 🚀 Instant execution
Security Riskier for sensitive data Fort Knox-level control
Maintenance GitLab’s problem Your DevOps team’s headache
Customization Limited Unlimited (want macOS M1? Done!)

Real-World Scenarios: What Would You Choose?

  1. Startup MVP: Use shared runners to save cash while iterating fast.
  2. Healthcare App: Self-hosted runners to comply with HIPAA.
  3. Open-Source Library: Shared runners (free + community-friendly).
  4. AI Training Pipeline: Self-hosted GPU runners for model training.

Pro Tips to Optimize Runners

  • Hybrid Approach: Use shared runners for non-sensitive jobs (linting) and self-hosted for deployments.
  • Autoscaling: Set up self-hosted runners with Kubernetes to handle peak loads.
  • Tags: Direct jobs to specific runners (e.g., gpu, windows). 
  job:  
    tags:  
      - gpu
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

“But What If I’m Stuck?”

  • Shared Runner Limbo: Upgrade to GitLab Premium for more minutes or reduce job runtime (cache dependencies!).
  • Self-Hosted Meltdown: Use the GitLab Runner Helm Chart for easy Kubernetes setup.

Final Verdict

  • Shared Runners = The easy, free, but sometimes sluggish option.
  • Self-Hosted Runners = The powerful, customizable, but high-effort choice.

Your move:

  • If you’re a solo dev or small team, start with shared runners.
  • If you’re scaling, need speed, or handle sensitive data, go self-hosted.

Either way, stop waiting for pipelines—and start shipping code like a pro. 🚢

Got runner horror stories? Share them below—let’s cry (and fix!) together. 💻🔥

Top comments (0)